2012 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 2.8 CRDi (197 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Jeep Wrangler vs 2012 Volvo XC60 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
XC60
Volvo XC60 3.2 (243 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Jeep WranglerSpecificationVolvo XC60
JeepMakeVolvo
WranglerModelXC60
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Jeep WranglerSpecificationVolvo XC60
11,1 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2776 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
197 HPPower243 HP
460 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Jeep WranglerSpecificationVolvo XC60
DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Jeep WranglerSpecificationVolvo XC60
4751 mmLength4627 mm
1877 mmWidth1891 mm
1840 mmHeight1713 mm
2053 KgWeight1810 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2774 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Jeep Wrangler and 2012 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…