DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationBMW X3
VolvoMakeBMW
V50ModelX3
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationBMW X3
6,9 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
240 km/hTop speed208 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
220 HPPower192 HP
320 NmTorque245 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationBMW X3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption15,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,7 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationBMW X3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationBMW X3
4514 mmLength4569 mm
1770 mmWidth1853 mm
1452 mmHeight1674 mm
—Weight1815 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…