E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 BMW X3 vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo V50
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelV50
2004Model year2004
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo V50
8,9 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
208 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
192 HPPower220 HP
245 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank62 lt
15,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,2 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo V50
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo V50
4569 mmLength4514 mm
1853 mmWidth1770 mm
1674 mmHeight1452 mm
1815 KgWeight—
2795 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 BMW X3 and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

2004 Volvo S60VS2004 BMW X3Volvo S60 vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model years2004 Volvo S80VS2004 BMW X3Volvo S80 vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model years2004 Volvo V70VS2004 BMW X3Volvo V70 vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model years2004 Kia OptimaVS2004 BMW X3Kia Optima vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVS2004 BMW X3Hyundai Grandeur/Azera vs BMW X32004 and 2004 model years

Comments are loading…