DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar X-type vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolvo
X-typeModelV50
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
225 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
196 HPPower220 HP
241 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,6 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4672 mmLength4514 mm
1789 mmWidth1770 mm
1430 mmHeight1452 mm
1570 KgWeight—
2710 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar X-type and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…