2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.5 20V T5 (220 Hp) 2004Overall Score70.75/100
2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Jaguar X-type Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Jaguar
X-type
Jaguar X-type 2.5 i V6 24V (196 Hp) 2004Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V50
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationJaguar X-type
VolvoMakeJaguar
V50ModelX-type
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationJaguar X-type
6,9 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
240 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
220 HPPower196 HP
320 NmTorque241 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationJaguar X-type
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank61 lt
—Urban consumption13,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationJaguar X-type
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationJaguar X-type
4514 mmLength4672 mm
1770 mmWidth1789 mm
1452 mmHeight1430 mm
—Weight1570 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2710 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Jaguar X-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…