DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Volvo V40 vs 1996 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo 960
VolvoMakeVolvo
V40Model960
1997Model year1996
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo 960
7,3 s0–100 km/h—
235 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1948 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
200 HPPower190 HP
300 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo 960
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption15 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo 960
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo 960
4516 mmLength4871 mm
1716 mmWidth1750 mm
1425 mmHeight1411 mm
1335 KgWeight—
2562 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Volvo V40 and 1996 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…