DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Caterham 21 vs 1997 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Caterham 21

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

CaterhamMakeVolvo
21ModelV40
1997Model year1997
CabrioletBody typeEstate
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

5,0 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
220 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
203 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank60 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/45 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3800 mmLength4516 mm
1580 mmWidth1716 mm
1150 mmHeight1425 mm
650 KgWeight1335 Kg
2230 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Caterham 21 and 1997 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Caterham 21 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…