DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo 960 vs 1997 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 960SpecificationVolvo V40
VolvoMakeVolvo
960ModelV40
1996Model year1997
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo 960SpecificationVolvo V40
—0–100 km/h7,3 s
210 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1948 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
280 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 960SpecificationVolvo V40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
15 ltUrban consumption13,7 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 960SpecificationVolvo V40
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 960SpecificationVolvo V40
4871 mmLength4516 mm
1750 mmWidth1716 mm
1411 mmHeight1425 mm
—Weight1335 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo 960 and 1997 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…