DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Volvo V40 vs 1996 Honda Sm-x Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda Sm-x
VolvoMakeHonda
V40ModelSm-x
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda Sm-x
10,5 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1731 ccEngine displacement1973 cc
115 HPPower131 HP
165 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda Sm-x
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
10 ltUrban consumption8,93 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,43 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda Sm-x
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationHonda Sm-x
4480 mmLength3950 mm
1720 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1750 mm
1303 KgWeight1330 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Volvo V40 and 1996 Honda Sm-x approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…