DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Honda Sm-x vs 1996 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo V40
HondaMakeVolvo
Sm-xModelV40
1996Model year1996
MinivanBody typeEstate
4Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo V40
7,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1731 cc
131 HPPower115 HP
186 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo V40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption10 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Honda Sm-xSpecificationVolvo V40
3950 mmLength4480 mm
1695 mmWidth1720 mm
1750 mmHeight1410 mm
1330 KgWeight1303 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Honda Sm-x and 1996 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…