1996 • Alfa Romeo
146
Alfa Romeo 146 1.7 i.e. 16V (129 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.5/100
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 vs 1996 Volvo V40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.8 16V (115 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationVolvo V40
Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
146ModelV40
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationVolvo V40
10,2 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
202 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1712 ccEngine displacement1731 cc
129 HPPower115 HP
148 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationVolvo V40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
8,5 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Alfa Romeo 146SpecificationVolvo V40
4257 mmLength4480 mm
1712 mmWidth1720 mm
1425 mmHeight1410 mm
1225 KgWeight1303 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Alfa Romeo 146 and 1996 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…