2013 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.6 T2 (120 Hp) 2013Overall Score59.5/100
2013 Volvo V40 vs 2013 Renault Trafic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Renault
Trafic
Renault Trafic 2.0 dCi (115 Hp) 2013Overall Score58.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
59.5–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationRenault Trafic
VolvoMakeRenault
V40ModelTrafic
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats9
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationRenault Trafic
9,9 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
0 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
240 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationRenault Trafic
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank90 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationRenault Trafic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationRenault Trafic
4369 mmLength4782 mm
1783 mmWidth1904 mm
1420 mmHeight1940 mm
1463 KgWeight1785 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase3098 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Volvo V40 and 2013 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…