DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mini Convertible vs 2013 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeVolvo
ConvertibleModelV40
2013Model year2013
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
122 HPPower120 HP
160 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R15 84HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3723 mmLength4369 mm
1683 mmWidth1783 mm
1414 mmHeight1420 mm
1165 KgWeight1463 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mini Convertible and 2013 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…