DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Citroen C3 vs 2013 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V40
CitroenMakeVolvo
C3ModelV40
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V40
8,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
160 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C3SpecificationVolvo V40
3941 mmLength4369 mm
1728 mmWidth1783 mm
1524 mmHeight1420 mm
1075 KgWeight1463 Kg
2466 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Citroen C3 and 2013 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…