DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo V40 vs 2013 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
V40ModelClio
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed199 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1197 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
240 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank45 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4369 mmLength4062 mm
1783 mmWidth1732 mm
1420 mmHeight1448 mm
1463 KgWeight980 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2589 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo V40 and 2013 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…