DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo V40 vs 2013 Mini Convertible Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Convertible

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMini
V40ModelConvertible
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower122 HP
240 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4369 mmLength3723 mm
1783 mmWidth1683 mm
1420 mmHeight1414 mm
1463 KgWeight1165 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo V40 and 2013 Mini Convertible approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Convertible leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…