DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo V40 vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 3
VolvoMakeMazda
V40Model3
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 3
9,9 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
0 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
240 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationMazda 3
4369 mmLength4460 mm
1783 mmWidth1755 mm
1420 mmHeight1470 mm
1463 KgWeight1255 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo V40 and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…