2013 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.6 T2 (120 Hp) 2013Overall Score59.5/100
2013 Volvo V40 vs 2013 Citroen C3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Citroen
C3
Citroen C3 1.6 VTi (120 Hp) 2013Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Citroen C3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen C3
VolvoMakeCitroen
V40ModelC3
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen C3
9,9 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
240 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationCitroen C3
4369 mmLength3941 mm
1783 mmWidth1728 mm
1420 mmHeight1524 mm
1463 KgWeight1075 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2466 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Volvo V40 and 2013 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…