2016 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.0 D4 (163 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
2016 Volvo S80 vs 2016 SsangYong Rexton Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • SsangYong
Rexton
SsangYong Rexton 2016Overall Score76.5/100
WINNER
SsangYong Rexton
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
VolvoMakeSsangYong
S80ModelRexton
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower155 HP
400 NmTorque360 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S80SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/75 R16; 255/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
4854 mmLength4755 mm
1907 mmWidth1900 mm
1493 mmHeight1785-1840 mm
1629 KgWeight1901-1965 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Volvo S80 and 2016 SsangYong Rexton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…