E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 BMW X3 vs 2016 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
BMWMakeVolvo
X3ModelS80
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
195 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower163 HP
360 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
DieselFuel typeDiesel
67 ltFuel tank70 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,0 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/60 R17 99VTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW X3SpecificationVolvo S80
4657 mmLength4854 mm
1881 mmWidth1907 mm
1661 mmHeight1493 mm
1660 KgWeight1629 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 BMW X3 and 2016 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVS2016 BMW X3DS 5 vs BMW X32016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVS2016 BMW X3SsangYong Rexton vs BMW X32016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVS2016 BMW X3SsangYong Rodius vs BMW X32016 and 2016 model years2016 Peugeot 508VS2016 BMW X3Peugeot 508 vs BMW X32016 and 2016 model years2016 Volvo S80VS2016 BMW X3Volvo S80 vs BMW X32016 and 2016 model years

Comments are loading…