E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo S80 vs 2016 Fiat Toro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S80SpecificationFiat Toro
VolvoMakeFiat
S80ModelToro
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S80SpecificationFiat Toro
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
163 HPPower170 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S80SpecificationFiat Toro
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S80SpecificationFiat Toro
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/70 R16; 225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S80SpecificationFiat Toro
4854 mmLength4915 mm
1907 mmWidth1844 mm
1493 mmHeight1746 mm
1629 KgWeight1709 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2990 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo S80 and 2016 Fiat Toro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVS2016 Volvo S80Mazda MX-5 vs Volvo S802016 and 2016 model years2016 BMW Z4VS2016 Volvo S80BMW Z4 vs Volvo S802016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVS2016 Volvo S80Mazda CX-4 vs Volvo S802016 and 2016 model years2016 BMW X3VS2016 Volvo S80BMW X3 vs Volvo S802016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVS2016 Volvo S80SsangYong Rexton vs Volvo S802016 and 2016 model years

Comments are loading…