DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 6
VolvoMakeMazda
S40Model6
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 6
7,2 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed223 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
230 HPPower192 HP
320 NmTorque256 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S40SpecificationMazda 6
4476 mmLength4865 mm
1770 mmWidth1840 mm
1454 mmHeight1450 mm
1478 KgWeight1360 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…