2012 • Nissan
Murano
Nissan Murano 2.5 dCi (190 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Nissan Murano vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.5i T5 (230 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Murano
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan MuranoSpecificationVolvo S40
NissanMakeVolvo
MuranoModelS40
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Nissan MuranoSpecificationVolvo S40
10,5 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
190 HPPower230 HP
450 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan MuranoSpecificationVolvo S40
DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan MuranoSpecificationVolvo S40
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/55 R20Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan MuranoSpecificationVolvo S40
4860 mmLength4476 mm
1885 mmWidth1770 mm
1720 mmHeight1454 mm
1875 KgWeight1478 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Nissan Murano and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Murano leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…