DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan Navara vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Navara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeVolvo
NavaraModelS40
2012Model year2012
Pick-upBody typeSedan
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
172 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
190 HPPower230 HP
403 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption13,5 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/70 R16; 255/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5222 mmLength4476 mm
1848 mmWidth1770 mm
1773 mmHeight1454 mm
1815 KgWeight1478 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan Navara and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Navara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…