2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.5i T5 (230 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2013 Jeep Wrangler Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Jeep
Wrangler
Jeep Wrangler 2.8 CRDi Sahara (197 Hp) 2013Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Jeep Wrangler
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationJeep Wrangler
VolvoMakeJeep
S40ModelWrangler
2012Model year2013
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats4
4Doors3
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationJeep Wrangler
7,2 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed172 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2776 cc
230 HPPower197 HP
320 NmTorque460 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationJeep Wrangler
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank66 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationJeep Wrangler
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size245/75 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationJeep Wrangler
4476 mmLength4223 mm
1770 mmWidth1873 mm
1454 mmHeight1840 mm
1478 KgWeight1858 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2424 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2013 Jeep Wrangler approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Jeep Wrangler leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…