2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.5i T5 (230 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
2012 Volvo S40 vs 2012 GMC Canyon Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • GMC
Canyon
GMC Canyon 2.9 (185 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
GMC Canyon
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S40SpecificationGMC Canyon
VolvoMakeGMC
S40ModelCanyon
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5/6
4Doors4
Performance
Volvo S40SpecificationGMC Canyon
7,2 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2921 cc
230 HPPower185 HP
320 NmTorque258 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S40SpecificationGMC Canyon
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank74 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,0 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S40SpecificationGMC Canyon
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/75 R15; 225/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S40SpecificationGMC Canyon
4476 mmLength5260 mm
1770 mmWidth1717 mm
1454 mmHeight1656 mm
1478 KgWeight1668 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase3200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S40 and 2012 GMC Canyon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, GMC Canyon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…