DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo S40 vs 2013 Chevrolet Malibu Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Malibu

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeChevrolet
S40ModelMalibu
2012Model year2013
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
230 HPPower197 HP
320 NmTorque259 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,5 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6 Hydra-Matic
—Tyre size215/60 R16; 225/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4476 mmLength4865 mm
1770 mmWidth1854 mm
1454 mmHeight1462 mm
1478 KgWeight1560 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2738 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo S40 and 2013 Chevrolet Malibu approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Malibu leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…