DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo C70 vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeAlfa Romeo
C70Model156
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
220 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
200 HPPower175 HP
285 NmTorque385 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank63 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/50 R16Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4716 mmLength4435 mm
1817 mmWidth1743 mm
1429 mmHeight1430 mm
1570 KgWeight1385 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo C70 and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…