DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Saab 9-2X vs 2004 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-2X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-2XSpecificationVolvo C70
SaabMakeVolvo
9-2XModelC70
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Saab 9-2XSpecificationVolvo C70
—0–100 km/h8,5 s
196 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
173 HPPower200 HP
225 NmTorque285 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-2XSpecificationVolvo C70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank68 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-2XSpecificationVolvo C70
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-2XSpecificationVolvo C70
4460 mmLength4716 mm
1695 mmWidth1817 mm
1465 mmHeight1429 mm
1395 KgWeight1570 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Saab 9-2X and 2004 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-2X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…