DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 166 vs 2004 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
166ModelC70
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
222 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
175 HPPower200 HP
330 NmTorque285 Nm
5Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
69 ltFuel tank68 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption13,6 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4716 mm
1800 mmWidth1817 mm
1416 mmHeight1429 mm
1580 KgWeight1570 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 166 and 2004 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…