DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo C70 vs 2005 Honda S2000 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda S2000

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeHonda
C70ModelS2000
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h6,2 s
240 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2319 ccEngine displacement2157 cc
239 HPPower242 HP
330 NmTorque221 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
17,1 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
8,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
11,7 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre sizeFront tyres: 215/45 R17, Rear tyres: 245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4135 mm
1820 mmWidth1750 mm
1410 mmHeight1285 mm
1620 KgWeight1250 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo C70 and 2005 Honda S2000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda S2000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…