DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Honda S2000 vs 2004 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda S2000

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeVolvo
S2000ModelC70
2005Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

6,2 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
240 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2157 ccEngine displacement2319 cc
242 HPPower239 HP
221 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption17,1 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
Front tyres: 215/45 R17, Rear tyres: 245/40 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4135 mmLength4720 mm
1750 mmWidth1820 mm
1285 mmHeight1410 mm
1250 KgWeight1620 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Honda S2000 and 2004 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda S2000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…