DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Jaguar X-type vs 2004 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeVolvo
X-typeModelC70
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h7,2 s
225 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2319 cc
196 HPPower239 HP
241 NmTorque330 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,6 ltUrban consumption17,1 lt
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,7 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4672 mmLength4720 mm
1789 mmWidth1820 mm
1430 mmHeight1410 mm
1570 KgWeight1620 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Jaguar X-type and 2004 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…