DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo C70 vs 2004 Seat Toledo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSeat
C70ModelToledo
2004Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
220 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
180 HPPower140 HP
220 NmTorque320 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
16,3 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength4458 mm
1820 mmWidth1768 mm
1410 mmHeight1568 mm
1570 KgWeight1454 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo C70 and 2004 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…