DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Seat Altea vs 2004 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Seat AlteaSpecificationVolvo C70
SeatMakeVolvo
AlteaModelC70
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Seat AlteaSpecificationVolvo C70
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
201 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1968 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
140 HPPower180 HP
320 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Seat AlteaSpecificationVolvo C70
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption16,3 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Seat AlteaSpecificationVolvo C70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Seat AlteaSpecificationVolvo C70
4280 mmLength4720 mm
1768 mmWidth1820 mm
1568 mmHeight1410 mm
1430 KgWeight1570 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Seat Altea and 2004 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…