DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 vs 2004 Volvo C70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C70

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeVolvo
156ModelC70
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
200 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower180 HP
305 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption16,3 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size225/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4441 mmLength4720 mm
1743 mmWidth1820 mm
1458 mmHeight1410 mm
1510 KgWeight1570 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Alfa Romeo 156 and 2004 Volvo C70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C70 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…