2010 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 1.6 i 16V (100) 2010Overall Score57.25/100
2010 Volvo C30 vs 2010 Mini Countryman Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mini
Countryman
Mini Countryman 1.6 (90 Hp) 2010Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Volvo C30
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo C30SpecificationMini Countryman
VolvoMakeMini
C30ModelCountryman
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
3Doors5
Performance
Volvo C30SpecificationMini Countryman
11,8 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
185 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo C30SpecificationMini Countryman
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption4,7 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
7 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo C30SpecificationMini Countryman
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16 92H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo C30SpecificationMini Countryman
4252 mmLength4097 mm
1782 mmWidth1789 mm
1447 mmHeight1561 mm
1279 KgWeight1310 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2595 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Volvo C30 and 2010 Mini Countryman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…