2010 • Mini
Countryman
Mini Countryman 1.6 (90 Hp) 2010Overall Score56.25/100
2010 Mini Countryman vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 1.6 i 16V (100) 2010Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Volvo C30
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mini CountrymanSpecificationVolvo C30
MiniMakeVolvo
CountrymanModelC30
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
4/5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Mini CountrymanSpecificationVolvo C30
12,9 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
170 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
90 HPPower100 HP
215 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mini CountrymanSpecificationVolvo C30
DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
4,7 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
4,4 ltAverage consumption7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mini CountrymanSpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16 92HTyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mini CountrymanSpecificationVolvo C30
4097 mmLength4252 mm
1789 mmWidth1782 mm
1561 mmHeight1447 mm
1310 KgWeight1279 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Mini Countryman and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…