DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mazda 2 vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo C30
MazdaMakeVolvo
2ModelC30
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo C30
11,5 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
175 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
95 HPPower100 HP
205 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo C30
DieselFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,0 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 2SpecificationVolvo C30
3920 mmLength4252 mm
1695 mmWidth1782 mm
1475 mmHeight1447 mm
1025 KgWeight1279 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mazda 2 and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…