DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo C30 vs 2010 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo C30

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 2
VolvoMakeMazda
C30Model2
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 2
11,8 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
185 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
100 HPPower95 HP
150 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank43 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption5,0 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
7 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationMazda 2
4252 mmLength3920 mm
1782 mmWidth1695 mm
1447 mmHeight1475 mm
1279 KgWeight1025 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo C30 and 2010 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo C30 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…