DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Volvo 960 vs 1990 Mazda 929 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda 929
VolvoMakeMazda
960Model929
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda 929
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2383 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
115 HPPower110 HP
225 NmTorque168 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda 929
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
11 ltUrban consumption16 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda 929
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo 960SpecificationMazda 929
4871 mmLength4690 mm
1750 mmWidth1695 mm
1411 mmHeight1425 mm
1600 KgWeight1470 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2710 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Volvo 960 and 1990 Mazda 929 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…