1990 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 2.6i (150 Hp) 1990Overall Score64.5/100
1990 Opel Omega vs 1990 Volvo 960 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Volvo
960
Volvo 960 2.4 TD (115 Hp) 1990Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Volvo 960
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 960
OpelMakeVolvo
OmegaModel960
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 960
9,8 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2594 ccEngine displacement2383 cc
150 HPPower115 HP
220 NmTorque225 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 960
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,1 ltUrban consumption11 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 960
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationVolvo 960
4740 mmLength4871 mm
1760 mmWidth1750 mm
1445 mmHeight1411 mm
1415 KgWeight1600 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2770 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Opel Omega and 1990 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…