DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Mazda 929 vs 1990 Volvo 960 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo 960

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 929SpecificationVolvo 960
MazdaMakeVolvo
929Model960
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda 929SpecificationVolvo 960
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2383 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
168 NmTorque225 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 929SpecificationVolvo 960
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
16 ltUrban consumption11 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 929SpecificationVolvo 960
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15 91 HTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 929SpecificationVolvo 960
4690 mmLength4871 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1425 mmHeight1411 mm
1470 KgWeight1600 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Mazda 929 and 1990 Volvo 960 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo 960 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…