2016 • Volvo
XC70
Volvo XC70 2.4 D4 (163 Hp) 2016Overall Score72.75/100
2016 Volvo XC70 vs 2016 Buick Regal Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 2.4 (200 Hp) 2016Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Buick Regal
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
72.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo XC70SpecificationBuick Regal
VolvoMakeBuick
XC70ModelRegal
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo XC70SpecificationBuick Regal
10,4 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
163 HPPower200 HP
420 NmTorque280 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo XC70SpecificationBuick Regal
DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
70 ltFuel tank59 lt
6,1 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo XC70SpecificationBuick Regal
4838 mmLength4831 mm
1870 mmWidth1857 mm
1604 mmHeight1483 mm
—Weight1633 Kg
2815 mmWheelbase2738 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Volvo XC70 and 2016 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableMitsubishi Pajero vs Volvo XC702016 and 2016 model years
VSImage unavailableMazda 6 vs Volvo XC702016 and 2016 model years
VSImage unavailableChevrolet Captiva vs Volvo XC702016 and 2016 model yearsVSImage unavailableBuick Regal vs Volvo XC702016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableMazda CX-5 vs Volvo XC702016 and 2016 model yearsComments are loading…