DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volkswagen Polo vs 2009 Renault Logan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeRenault
PoloModelLogan
2009Model year2009
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h—
188 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower102 HP
250 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,8 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3897 mmLength4250 mm
1650 mmWidth1735 mm
1465 mmHeight1525 mm
1095 KgWeight—
2460 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volkswagen Polo and 2009 Renault Logan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…