DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Renault Logan vs 2009 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolkswagen
LoganModelPolo
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
102 HPPower100 HP
145 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size165/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4250 mmLength3897 mm
1735 mmWidth1650 mm
1525 mmHeight1465 mm
—Weight1095 Kg
2630 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Renault Logan and 2009 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…