DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Brilliance BS4 vs 2009 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BrillianceMakeVolkswagen
BS4ModelPolo
2009Model year2009
—Body typeHatchback
—Seats5
—Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,7 s
0 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1584 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
100 HPPower100 HP
134 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption6,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size165/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length3897 mm
—Width1650 mm
—Height1465 mm
—Weight1095 Kg
—Wheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Brilliance BS4 and 2009 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…