DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volkswagen Phideon vs 2016 Fiat Toro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeFiat
PhideonModelToro
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

8,1 s0–100 km/h—
240 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
224 HPPower170 HP
350 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7 DSGGears6
—Tyre size225/70 R16; 225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5074 mmLength4915 mm
1893 mmWidth1844 mm
1489 mmHeight1746 mm
1815 KgWeight1709 Kg
3009 mmWheelbase2990 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volkswagen Phideon and 2016 Fiat Toro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…