DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi A1 vs 2016 Volkswagen Phideon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Phideon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeVolkswagen
A1ModelPhideon
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
234 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
192 HPPower224 HP
250 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank75 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
7 S tronicGears7 DSG
215/45 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3973 mmLength5074 mm
1740 mmWidth1893 mm
1416 mmHeight1489 mm
1180 KgWeight1815 Kg
2469 mmWheelbase3009 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi A1 and 2016 Volkswagen Phideon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Phideon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…