DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Fiat Toro vs 2016 Volkswagen Phideon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeVolkswagen
ToroModelPhideon
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,1 s
190 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1956 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
170 HPPower224 HP
350 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7 DSG
225/70 R16; 225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4915 mmLength5074 mm
1844 mmWidth1893 mm
1746 mmHeight1489 mm
1709 KgWeight1815 Kg
2990 mmWheelbase3009 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Fiat Toro and 2016 Volkswagen Phideon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…